The merits of the Oxfordian argument on the Shakespearean Authorship Question have won me over to the Earl’s side.
Does Seneca’s Genius-Madness dichotomy still apply in the contemporary world?
Wittgenstein’s Tractus over-emphasizes the role of language, doesn’t it?
She’s so Popperian, only give me marginal fashion suggestions. She probably doesn’t believe in Induction as science, either.
I, personally, would characterize John Stuart Mill as the consummate intellect without a soul.